Where to start? Who knows, the country is in such disarray, I don't know.
The President violates his oath of office with not even a thought. I understand why the Democrats ignore it, but the Republicans? Why are they not challenging him? Why do they not demand that he follow the law? I realize Eric Holder will do nothing about it, but they ought to at least have on record that they have censured the President for what he is doing.
He has figured out that he can just refuse to enforce the laws of the land or ignore them to remold this country in the image he would like to see.
Gay Marriage, Gun control, finances, now immigration. There are more, but these are some of the most blatant violations by him.
His bumbling, all-over-the-map foreign policy has emboldened Vladimir Putin to move against Crimea and now Ukraine.
Now the middle east is melting down and he's directly responsible. He foolishly believed that he could just shut down the military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and bring the troops home--thought he'd be hailed as a hero and those places would just fade into the dusty books of history.
The fools who voted him in for a second term are partly to blame for this, as well as the prideful 4 million voters who stayed home and refused to vote for Mitt Romney. While Romney may not have been their 'dream' candidate, he at least would not have allowed the middle east to implode and he would not have let Putin run amok, rebuilding the USSR and HE would have been taking us OUT of a recession, not sending us back into one!
They say you get the country you deserve, well, I guess we deserve the hell in a handbasket we've got today.
Disgusted but feeling a little better after a nice good rant:)
A Blog where I mix Religion with Politics--The literary equivalent of running with scissors!
Thursday, June 12, 2014
Wednesday, October 23, 2013
Time to clean house in Utah's Republican Party
Apparently the long knives are out for Mike Lee from members of his own party here in Utah. Some are not happy that he refuses to 'go along to get along' doing business as usual in Washington DC. They think they can do a better job of being carbon copy cut outs of the typical Washington politician. I guess they haven't gotten the message that "We, The People" are tired of their schtick.
As a Utah voter who is still registered as a "Republican" (which may well change), I'm making a list of some of Lee's critics within the party who've gone after Mike Lee--so I can remember to NOT support them in any positions of power or send them any money if they try to run for office.
A. Scott Anderson
Spencer Zwick
Ex Gov Mike Leavitt
Rich McKeown
Thomas Wright
Dan Lillenquist
John Price
Fred Lampropolous
Jon Huntsman (He's not really a Republican, just figures he can win if he runs as one)
Hopefully other Republican Conservatives will wake up as well and realize our Party and whatever we might have stood for was sacrificed on the altar of these men's egos and ambitions long ago.
As a Utah voter who is still registered as a "Republican" (which may well change), I'm making a list of some of Lee's critics within the party who've gone after Mike Lee--so I can remember to NOT support them in any positions of power or send them any money if they try to run for office.
A. Scott Anderson
Spencer Zwick
Ex Gov Mike Leavitt
Rich McKeown
Thomas Wright
Dan Lillenquist
John Price
Fred Lampropolous
Jon Huntsman (He's not really a Republican, just figures he can win if he runs as one)
Hopefully other Republican Conservatives will wake up as well and realize our Party and whatever we might have stood for was sacrificed on the altar of these men's egos and ambitions long ago.
Tuesday, September 17, 2013
America gets another wake up call
Something is wrong with our society. The Newtown shooting, the Colorado Theatre shooting and now the Naval Yard shooting are not random acts of violence, they are the acting out by some disturbed young men who were raised in a society that preaches moral relativism and where few young people were schooled in any kind of religious beliefs or practices. They were raised in a society where a nuclear intact family is rare and even discouraged. They were raised on a media diet of violence and in a society that believes the value of human life is relative.
Since the 1960's our society has been falling apart at a steady rate and after a couple of generations raised under these circumstances, we are now reaping the consequences.
I realize that most people who carry out these kinds of massacres are mentally ill, but mental illness alone does not create mass murderers--more ingredients need to be added to the pot for a mass murderer to develop and be able to act. I think society has been experimenting with some very damaging things and we are now seeing the result.
There IS something wrong with our society, but it can be fixed, if we want to. Start by loving our family members, serving others, hard, honest work and returning to a belief in moral absolutes. Putting the needs of others first would go a long way to turning this sinking ship around. The Savior, Jesus Christ, was our God at one time--as a nation, whether they admitted it or not, people in general lived by his code--'Do unto others as you would have them do unto you' and love God as well as your fellowmen. Over the years, we've left the churches that taught us how to be good people, we no longer read his word, and we have elevated the pursuit of pleasure, wealth and fame as our top priority. Our heroes are degenerate narcissists. We drug ourselves with legal and illegal substances and distract from our day to day concernes with various forms of entertainment. We put our own selfish desires above even our own children's needs. And then, as a society, we are shocked and appalled to find that each successive generation raised under these circumstances is more screwed up than the last.
We're better than this. We're Americans; that used to mean something--if you want to know what it meant, study our Nation's history; we were indeed, 'exceptional'. It is time for us as a nation to wake up and fix this mess....the first place to start is in our own lives and with our own families.
Since the 1960's our society has been falling apart at a steady rate and after a couple of generations raised under these circumstances, we are now reaping the consequences.
I realize that most people who carry out these kinds of massacres are mentally ill, but mental illness alone does not create mass murderers--more ingredients need to be added to the pot for a mass murderer to develop and be able to act. I think society has been experimenting with some very damaging things and we are now seeing the result.
There IS something wrong with our society, but it can be fixed, if we want to. Start by loving our family members, serving others, hard, honest work and returning to a belief in moral absolutes. Putting the needs of others first would go a long way to turning this sinking ship around. The Savior, Jesus Christ, was our God at one time--as a nation, whether they admitted it or not, people in general lived by his code--'Do unto others as you would have them do unto you' and love God as well as your fellowmen. Over the years, we've left the churches that taught us how to be good people, we no longer read his word, and we have elevated the pursuit of pleasure, wealth and fame as our top priority. Our heroes are degenerate narcissists. We drug ourselves with legal and illegal substances and distract from our day to day concernes with various forms of entertainment. We put our own selfish desires above even our own children's needs. And then, as a society, we are shocked and appalled to find that each successive generation raised under these circumstances is more screwed up than the last.
We're better than this. We're Americans; that used to mean something--if you want to know what it meant, study our Nation's history; we were indeed, 'exceptional'. It is time for us as a nation to wake up and fix this mess....the first place to start is in our own lives and with our own families.
Wednesday, August 7, 2013
A Republic on the edge of demise
The Prophet of the Restoration, Joseph Smith, warned of a time when there would be a very serious threat to our Constitutional Government and he also told us the remedy;
“Even this nation will be on the verge of crumbling to pieces and tumbling to the ground and when the Constitution is on the brink of ruin this people will be the staff upon which the nation shall lean and they shall bear the Constitution away from the very verge of destruction.” (Joseph Smith Papers, LDS Church Historical Archives, Box 1, March 10, 1844.)
Through out the history of our Nation, there have been a number of times when the Constitution has been threatened and it has been saved by those who have banded together to voice strong public opinion or act politically to save it.
To a Representative Republic such as ours, Nationalized Healthcare, such as Obamacare, represents a clear deviation from our Constitution and will bind Americans down and remove many of our civil liberties.
The grassroots effort to defund Obamacare is one of those times in history and it gives every American the chance to stand up and be counted in opposing and attempting to stop the destruction of our liberties.
http://www.dontfundobamacare.com/?gclid=CMnW2bLe67gCFY4WMgod9noASg
“Even this nation will be on the verge of crumbling to pieces and tumbling to the ground and when the Constitution is on the brink of ruin this people will be the staff upon which the nation shall lean and they shall bear the Constitution away from the very verge of destruction.” (Joseph Smith Papers, LDS Church Historical Archives, Box 1, March 10, 1844.)
Through out the history of our Nation, there have been a number of times when the Constitution has been threatened and it has been saved by those who have banded together to voice strong public opinion or act politically to save it.
To a Representative Republic such as ours, Nationalized Healthcare, such as Obamacare, represents a clear deviation from our Constitution and will bind Americans down and remove many of our civil liberties.
The grassroots effort to defund Obamacare is one of those times in history and it gives every American the chance to stand up and be counted in opposing and attempting to stop the destruction of our liberties.
http://www.dontfundobamacare.com/?gclid=CMnW2bLe67gCFY4WMgod9noASg
Wednesday, June 26, 2013
Gay Marriage Ruling by the Supreme Court
So, the wait is over and the High Court has spoken. No surprises there; after seeing John Roberts efforts to salvage Obamacare last year, I was certain the court was NOT going to vote against the President's desire for California's law to be struck down. The decision on DOMA was the one I expected from this court. Never mind that the will of the voters is ignored in favor of a couple of judges. It will be interesting to see how they take it--though I suspect that if there are enough 'bread and circuses' to keep them distracted, Californians won't make much of a fuss.
The President immediately went on record stating that he won't force churches to perform gay marriages. I guess he thought this was supposed to allay fears, but it only proved to me that he will eventually manipulate laws and issue executive orders to 'force' or coerce (by hook or crook) till he gets churches to bow to his will. The very FACT that he made that statement tells me that he believes he has the power and the right to force churches to perform gay marriages. Some will fall in line, just as they did under Nazi Pressure during Hitler's reign of terror in Germany, but others will stand against him, firm to their principles and beliefs, though they will suffer for it.
Before he won his first Presidential election, Senator Obama told an adoring audience that he was one day away from 'fundamentally transforming this country'. He's right on track for completing his objective--I'm just not sure the transformation is what the American people had in mind and frankly, when they finally wake up and take notice, I don't think they'll be happy with the change. Unfortunately, it will be too late for the 'United' States of America.
http://washingtonexaminer.com/obama-i-wont-make-churches-conduct-gay-marriages/article/2532418
The President immediately went on record stating that he won't force churches to perform gay marriages. I guess he thought this was supposed to allay fears, but it only proved to me that he will eventually manipulate laws and issue executive orders to 'force' or coerce (by hook or crook) till he gets churches to bow to his will. The very FACT that he made that statement tells me that he believes he has the power and the right to force churches to perform gay marriages. Some will fall in line, just as they did under Nazi Pressure during Hitler's reign of terror in Germany, but others will stand against him, firm to their principles and beliefs, though they will suffer for it.
Before he won his first Presidential election, Senator Obama told an adoring audience that he was one day away from 'fundamentally transforming this country'. He's right on track for completing his objective--I'm just not sure the transformation is what the American people had in mind and frankly, when they finally wake up and take notice, I don't think they'll be happy with the change. Unfortunately, it will be too late for the 'United' States of America.
http://washingtonexaminer.com/obama-i-wont-make-churches-conduct-gay-marriages/article/2532418
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
Game of Thrones and the Gang of 8
I've been watching the Gang of 8 as they try to pass Immigration reform and realized why they are sewing the seeds of their own destruction--and it parallels what happened to the Starks in 'Game of Thrones'. Spoiler alert for any who are watching or reading the series, but at the end of the 2013 season, we see the Stark family make a disastrous decision which ends in their destruction.
Through some decisions they made, they lost their Bannermen (those who supported and fought with them) and yet, they still want to continue fighting to take the throne. They refuse to take the best and safest course of action and return home, regroup and live to fight another day--instead they choose to follow the only course of action open, but the one which involves the most risk for losing everything and is dependent on trusting a man they betrayed earlier. They want so badly to believe that he is sincere in 'burying the hatchet' that they ignore the warnings and willingly walk into a trap where they are slaughtered.
Marco Rubio is making THE SAME mistake. He is desperate to make a name for himself in immigration issues and desires to shore up his appeal with the hispanic vote and rather than be cautious and careful, he has made risky deals with those who have made it their quest to destroy his party and everything it stands for. Rubio has shown his inexperience and naivety in this action. Of course, if he's learned to play the game of Politics, this won't end as disastrously for Rubio as it did for the Starks. If it destroys his political career as a Republican, he can always switch parties. Savvy Politicians always make sure they have a life raft and jacket so they don't 'go down with the ship'--the hopes and desires of the citizens who voted for them.
Through some decisions they made, they lost their Bannermen (those who supported and fought with them) and yet, they still want to continue fighting to take the throne. They refuse to take the best and safest course of action and return home, regroup and live to fight another day--instead they choose to follow the only course of action open, but the one which involves the most risk for losing everything and is dependent on trusting a man they betrayed earlier. They want so badly to believe that he is sincere in 'burying the hatchet' that they ignore the warnings and willingly walk into a trap where they are slaughtered.
Marco Rubio is making THE SAME mistake. He is desperate to make a name for himself in immigration issues and desires to shore up his appeal with the hispanic vote and rather than be cautious and careful, he has made risky deals with those who have made it their quest to destroy his party and everything it stands for. Rubio has shown his inexperience and naivety in this action. Of course, if he's learned to play the game of Politics, this won't end as disastrously for Rubio as it did for the Starks. If it destroys his political career as a Republican, he can always switch parties. Savvy Politicians always make sure they have a life raft and jacket so they don't 'go down with the ship'--the hopes and desires of the citizens who voted for them.
Thursday, June 6, 2013
'Sit down and shut up'
Radio host Glenn Beck has said a number of times that this is the message of the Obama Administration to every request for 'transparency' on what is going on with the IRS targeting conservative groups, the AP phone tapping and the 9-11 attack on the Benghazi Embassy just for starters.
Well, we just witnessed the first lady, Michelle Obama essentially say that to one of representatives of her husband's most ardent supporters, the LGBT community. She was speaking at a Democrat fundraiser and a gay rights activist called out, asking when the President would sign an executive order to prevent discrimination against gays in the workplace. Michelle turned on this woman and we saw the mask slip--and it was frightening. She threatened to walk off the stage, rather than have to put up with someone speaking out of turn.
The audience immediately turned on the woman, one of their own, insisting that she leave. These people are an example of what Lenin termed 'useful idiots'. There were many from the gay community in attendance who gave a lot of money to get Obama reelected and I guess some, like the woman who spoke out, thought that earned them some right to speak out on what they wanted to see the President do with the four additional years they bought for him. If any were under that delusion, they got a rude awakening. The Obama Administration does as they please and if you question them you are told to 'sit down and shut up'.
The message came through loud and clear: 'Give us your money and we'll tell you what rights you can have, don't you DARE question us!'
Well, we just witnessed the first lady, Michelle Obama essentially say that to one of representatives of her husband's most ardent supporters, the LGBT community. She was speaking at a Democrat fundraiser and a gay rights activist called out, asking when the President would sign an executive order to prevent discrimination against gays in the workplace. Michelle turned on this woman and we saw the mask slip--and it was frightening. She threatened to walk off the stage, rather than have to put up with someone speaking out of turn.
The audience immediately turned on the woman, one of their own, insisting that she leave. These people are an example of what Lenin termed 'useful idiots'. There were many from the gay community in attendance who gave a lot of money to get Obama reelected and I guess some, like the woman who spoke out, thought that earned them some right to speak out on what they wanted to see the President do with the four additional years they bought for him. If any were under that delusion, they got a rude awakening. The Obama Administration does as they please and if you question them you are told to 'sit down and shut up'.
The message came through loud and clear: 'Give us your money and we'll tell you what rights you can have, don't you DARE question us!'
Monday, May 20, 2013
A very different outcome if the Nixon administration had been allowed to invesigate 'Watergate'
I like time machine and going back in time storylines--In the world of movies, they usually aren't very complex, but in reality, imagine a spiderweb of separate strands and what would happen if one strand were altered and what might be the possible implications for future events. Now imagine that when the first accusations came out against President Nixon, he had been allowed to have his Judicial Department investigate what we now know as 'Watergate'. Do you think they would have allowed the truth to come out? The truth which eventually exposed the serious illegal actions of the President, brought about impeachment proceedings and forced him to resign?
Reason tells us 'no'. Yet, the Obama Administration is insisting that they be allowed to investigate the events surrounding Benghazi, the IRS targetting political opponents and the illegal wire tapping of AP reporters.
WHO in their right mind thinks NOT appointing a special prosecutor to investigate is a good idea???? Let's hope our elected leaders in Washington will do the right thing and do their job to make sure this is investigated properly.
Reason tells us 'no'. Yet, the Obama Administration is insisting that they be allowed to investigate the events surrounding Benghazi, the IRS targetting political opponents and the illegal wire tapping of AP reporters.
WHO in their right mind thinks NOT appointing a special prosecutor to investigate is a good idea???? Let's hope our elected leaders in Washington will do the right thing and do their job to make sure this is investigated properly.
Tuesday, May 14, 2013
Someone needs to inform the Prez....
Now Pres. Obama says he didn't find out that his administration was wiretapping the AP until he read it in the newspaper.
Either he's a liar or his staff is incompetent. If he's a liar, there isn't much we can do about it--the people picked him, but if it is an incompetent staff, then they need to be replaced with people who can do their job; which apparently is to keep the President updated on current events between his parties, vacations and golf outings.
My guess is that he's lying and he's pretty bad at it. I remember the first time he lied to us--the people. He claimed he'd NEVER discussed his open senate seat with ANYONE. That was a foolish lie and right then I knew we were dealing with a habitual liar--one who doesn't even know how to lie convincingly. All he had to say was 'Of course I've discussed who they should consider to replace me in the Senate--but just giving suggestions is expected and that's the extent of my involvement.' But no, he had to claim he said nothing to anyone-hadn't had a conversation at all and this was totally unbelievable.
It is also unbelievable that no one on his staff ever warns him of things brewing--he's always oblivious to the scandals--even ones that have been simmering for a couple of years, such as the IRS mess.
If you are wondering, the answer is no...I don't think his staff is incompetent--at least not in this situation.
Either he's a liar or his staff is incompetent. If he's a liar, there isn't much we can do about it--the people picked him, but if it is an incompetent staff, then they need to be replaced with people who can do their job; which apparently is to keep the President updated on current events between his parties, vacations and golf outings.
My guess is that he's lying and he's pretty bad at it. I remember the first time he lied to us--the people. He claimed he'd NEVER discussed his open senate seat with ANYONE. That was a foolish lie and right then I knew we were dealing with a habitual liar--one who doesn't even know how to lie convincingly. All he had to say was 'Of course I've discussed who they should consider to replace me in the Senate--but just giving suggestions is expected and that's the extent of my involvement.' But no, he had to claim he said nothing to anyone-hadn't had a conversation at all and this was totally unbelievable.
It is also unbelievable that no one on his staff ever warns him of things brewing--he's always oblivious to the scandals--even ones that have been simmering for a couple of years, such as the IRS mess.
If you are wondering, the answer is no...I don't think his staff is incompetent--at least not in this situation.
Tuesday, May 7, 2013
Benghazi lies and obstruction in light of the Valerie Plame episode.
As more information comes to light about the Benghazi Embassy terror attack, it is clear that lies were told, the public was mislead and information was obscured--all to protect the President's reelection bid. It worked because he got his four more years.
I'm reminded of Scooter Libby and the Valerie Plame episode. Scooter Libby was indicted on two counts of perjury, two counts of making false statements to federal investigators and one count of obstructions of justice. He was forced to resign from the three government positions he held. He was later convicted of four of the five counts against him and received a prison sentence. Given what is being revealed about the Benghazi coverup, I'd expect nothing less than the same treatment if we find that govt. officials made false statements and obstructed justice--but I won't hold my breath.
Scooter Libby was Republican and that seems to be a requirement for justice to be meted out when it comes to political appointees behaving badly.
I'm reminded of Scooter Libby and the Valerie Plame episode. Scooter Libby was indicted on two counts of perjury, two counts of making false statements to federal investigators and one count of obstructions of justice. He was forced to resign from the three government positions he held. He was later convicted of four of the five counts against him and received a prison sentence. Given what is being revealed about the Benghazi coverup, I'd expect nothing less than the same treatment if we find that govt. officials made false statements and obstructed justice--but I won't hold my breath.
Scooter Libby was Republican and that seems to be a requirement for justice to be meted out when it comes to political appointees behaving badly.
Wednesday, May 1, 2013
Better late than never....
From Fox News.com this morning;
"President Obama said he is unaware of longstanding efforts by Republican lawmakers to question survivors of the Benghazi attacks but pledged to investigate the issue.
“I’m not familiar with this notion that anybody has been blocked from testifying,” the president said during a White House news conference on Tuesday. “So what I’ll do is I will find out what exactly you’re referring to.”
You've GOT to be kidding.... either he's a complete doof or he's lying. Let's give him the benefit of the doubt that he's sincere and REALLY has no clue what's been going on for months and months.
How pathetic is it when average citizens know more about what's going on in current events than the 'leader of the Free World'! Pres. Obama apparently doesn't even bother to read newspapers, let alone attend briefings.
Could someone on his staff please READ the news stories to him while he's traveling around to his various golf outings and celebrity fundraisers???
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/05/01/obama-pledges-inquiry-on-benghazi-survivors-testimony/#ixzz2S3O1Sa6D
"President Obama said he is unaware of longstanding efforts by Republican lawmakers to question survivors of the Benghazi attacks but pledged to investigate the issue.
“I’m not familiar with this notion that anybody has been blocked from testifying,” the president said during a White House news conference on Tuesday. “So what I’ll do is I will find out what exactly you’re referring to.”
You've GOT to be kidding.... either he's a complete doof or he's lying. Let's give him the benefit of the doubt that he's sincere and REALLY has no clue what's been going on for months and months.
How pathetic is it when average citizens know more about what's going on in current events than the 'leader of the Free World'! Pres. Obama apparently doesn't even bother to read newspapers, let alone attend briefings.
Could someone on his staff please READ the news stories to him while he's traveling around to his various golf outings and celebrity fundraisers???
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/05/01/obama-pledges-inquiry-on-benghazi-survivors-testimony/#ixzz2S3O1Sa6D
Thursday, June 28, 2012
The Stamp act of 2012
Supreme court justice Roberts found the Mandate constitutional as a tax and so the mandate stands. Will this be the 'stamp act' tax of our day that finally wakes up Americans to what is happening in our country? Will they finally wake up to the fact that we no longer enjoy the freedoms we once had, that our President is governing like a King, ignoring Congress, the constitution and the obligations of his position?
I'm praying Americans will finally turn off their TV's, unplug their ipods, stop the endless pursuit of entertainment and aquisition and see what has happened to their rights and liberties as Americans.
I'm hoping this unfair 'tax' will have the same effect as the one passed over 200 years ago that caused our ancestors to take a stand against a King who had overstepped his bounds. I hope Americans will be true to their roots and take a stand against a President who has violated his 'subjects' rights as well.
June 28, 2012
I'm praying Americans will finally turn off their TV's, unplug their ipods, stop the endless pursuit of entertainment and aquisition and see what has happened to their rights and liberties as Americans.
I'm hoping this unfair 'tax' will have the same effect as the one passed over 200 years ago that caused our ancestors to take a stand against a King who had overstepped his bounds. I hope Americans will be true to their roots and take a stand against a President who has violated his 'subjects' rights as well.
June 28, 2012
Monday, June 25, 2012
Healthcare Law a violation of 'Right to Privacy'
It's Monday morning, June 25th and I'm waiting; hoping the Supreme court will give us their decision on the Healthcare Law. My own feeling is that the Supreme Court should strike it down because it violates the 'Right To Privacy' which the court has, a number of times before, found in the Constitution. If I am forced to buy health insurance, I am also forced to give up my private medical information to an insurance company. I am also forced to be under their jurisdiction for how I will be treated in my medical conditions. I think I should have the right to the privacy of my own body and my own medical treatment and allowing the govt. to regulate it violates that privacy.
I hope-- however they consider the law; the Supreme Court will come to the same conclusion-the law is over reaching and puts restraints on Americans' liberty to be a free people.
I hope we won't have too much longer to wait, to find out.
I hope-- however they consider the law; the Supreme Court will come to the same conclusion-the law is over reaching and puts restraints on Americans' liberty to be a free people.
I hope we won't have too much longer to wait, to find out.
Saturday, June 16, 2012
Is it time to Impeach our President?
President Obama announced his administration will no longer enforce our immigration laws in regards to certain illegal immigrants who reside within our country.
From a news story:
"For years the administration had said it didn’t have the authority to make such a move, saying it couldn’t decide to stop deporting wide categories of people on its own without approval from Congress. But on Friday President Obama says administration now interprets the law to give it the discretion."
From the White House's own website it states clearly what Pres. Obama has sworn under oath do to: "Under Article II of the Constitution, the President is responsible for the execution and enforcement of the laws created by Congress." When a President refuses to fulfill the responsibilities he swore to fill, it is time for Congress to take action. But will they? Or will they continue to complain about his outrageous flaunting of the rule of law, but allow him to continue to pick and choose what laws he will enforce. I hope Congress will do what they must to uphold the Constitution and warn the President that if he continues to refuse to enforce laws passed by them, he has abdicated his responsibilities and must be removed from office. Any President, no matter his party affiliation, must abide by the constraints of our Constitution, otherwise he is setting himself to be a Dictator and my hope and prayer is that Americans will not stand for that. We shall see.
From a news story:
"For years the administration had said it didn’t have the authority to make such a move, saying it couldn’t decide to stop deporting wide categories of people on its own without approval from Congress. But on Friday President Obama says administration now interprets the law to give it the discretion."
From the White House's own website it states clearly what Pres. Obama has sworn under oath do to: "Under Article II of the Constitution, the President is responsible for the execution and enforcement of the laws created by Congress." When a President refuses to fulfill the responsibilities he swore to fill, it is time for Congress to take action. But will they? Or will they continue to complain about his outrageous flaunting of the rule of law, but allow him to continue to pick and choose what laws he will enforce. I hope Congress will do what they must to uphold the Constitution and warn the President that if he continues to refuse to enforce laws passed by them, he has abdicated his responsibilities and must be removed from office. Any President, no matter his party affiliation, must abide by the constraints of our Constitution, otherwise he is setting himself to be a Dictator and my hope and prayer is that Americans will not stand for that. We shall see.
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
New strategy from the left
The voters won last night when Scott Walker and other Republican officials in Wisconsin managed to win re-election against the recall challenge. But we'd better not think this is over. Leftists have figured out a new way to subvert the will of the people. If your Democrat candidate doesn't win, just prevent the Republican winner from actually being able to govern by keeping them distracted with recalls, lawsuits, and charges of impropriety, fraud, scandal--whatever works to keep them from being able to do the job they were elected to do.
Hopefully the voters will wake up and see the game that is being played and the fact that it's costing them a ton of tax payer money to fight these challenges and once again, subverting the will of the people.
Hopefully the voters will wake up and see the game that is being played and the fact that it's costing them a ton of tax payer money to fight these challenges and once again, subverting the will of the people.
Friday, May 11, 2012
Breaking down Societal Taboos, one magazine cover at a time..
Time Magazine's controversial cover showing a woman breastfeeding her son was meant to do more than just sell magazines. That in itself is not controversial, but what made it so was the subtle sexual undertones in the layout. The mother, a beautiful woman, dressed scantily, baring her breast with a boy who looks to be six (though apparently three) latched on, both looking at the camera.
We've seen too much of the relentless attacks on Judeo-Christian values by the media and those they service to not see right through this.
It is a clear attempt to break down the strong taboo against incest. Now, I'm not saying this is incestuous. What I'm saying is that they wanted to make regular people uncomfortable--they wanted them to feel bad about the feelings they have at the image, chastising themselves for being 'judgmental'.
'This is just another choice. Breastfeeding is natural. We shouldn't judge'. Well, I'm a mother who breastfed my three children, though I stopped when they were between a year and a year and a half. I don't have any problems with breastfeeding and I feel that most mothers know when it's time to stop or it could cause unhealthy attachment issues. I also know that in some cultures children are breastfed a lot longer than in our culture with no problems. I don't have a problem with any of those things. I don't even care if the woman on Time's cover wants to breastfeed her three year old, though I seriously question her judgment in setting her son up for ridicule by peers as he gets older.
But I really am annoyed when I see I'm being manipulated by a magazine cover to make me associate breastfeeding with sexuality and I see it as an effort to break down the strong revulsions society carries toward incest. The media may have been able to break down many long held taboos in this society--and they're efforts seem to be working, but in this case, I think they will find it a harder sell. I sure hope so.
We've seen too much of the relentless attacks on Judeo-Christian values by the media and those they service to not see right through this.
It is a clear attempt to break down the strong taboo against incest. Now, I'm not saying this is incestuous. What I'm saying is that they wanted to make regular people uncomfortable--they wanted them to feel bad about the feelings they have at the image, chastising themselves for being 'judgmental'.
'This is just another choice. Breastfeeding is natural. We shouldn't judge'. Well, I'm a mother who breastfed my three children, though I stopped when they were between a year and a year and a half. I don't have any problems with breastfeeding and I feel that most mothers know when it's time to stop or it could cause unhealthy attachment issues. I also know that in some cultures children are breastfed a lot longer than in our culture with no problems. I don't have a problem with any of those things. I don't even care if the woman on Time's cover wants to breastfeed her three year old, though I seriously question her judgment in setting her son up for ridicule by peers as he gets older.
But I really am annoyed when I see I'm being manipulated by a magazine cover to make me associate breastfeeding with sexuality and I see it as an effort to break down the strong revulsions society carries toward incest. The media may have been able to break down many long held taboos in this society--and they're efforts seem to be working, but in this case, I think they will find it a harder sell. I sure hope so.
Wednesday, May 9, 2012
A very 'transparent' President
Pres. Obama claimed that his administration was going to be the most transparent. Well, he's right about one thing--his motives are pretty transparent with his 'evolved' position on Gay Marriage.
The Pres. came out in support of Gay Marriage--after years of claiming he was not for it. Why now? Simple; He needs money and the LGBT groups have the money. Once again he's exploiting a hot-button, emotionally charged issue to get people to open their wallets for him, at a time when his fundraising is worrisomely down. He couldn't come out in support during the first election because Blacks and Hispanics are consistently against redefining marriage and he didn't want to alienate those voters, but now, he'll take that chance for a short while in order to fill his coffers with much needed campaign funds as well as tie those voters to him.
And using his new 'enlightened' position in the future, we can be sure he'll try and polarize voters by pointing out Mitt Romney's support of Prop 8 and his support of marriage being between a man and a woman, which in turn, will bring the LGBT group firmly under his control.
I'm just hoping it backfires on him and he'll find it may give him the money he craves, but it won't bring him the votes--which is what actually counts come November.
The Pres. came out in support of Gay Marriage--after years of claiming he was not for it. Why now? Simple; He needs money and the LGBT groups have the money. Once again he's exploiting a hot-button, emotionally charged issue to get people to open their wallets for him, at a time when his fundraising is worrisomely down. He couldn't come out in support during the first election because Blacks and Hispanics are consistently against redefining marriage and he didn't want to alienate those voters, but now, he'll take that chance for a short while in order to fill his coffers with much needed campaign funds as well as tie those voters to him.
And using his new 'enlightened' position in the future, we can be sure he'll try and polarize voters by pointing out Mitt Romney's support of Prop 8 and his support of marriage being between a man and a woman, which in turn, will bring the LGBT group firmly under his control.
I'm just hoping it backfires on him and he'll find it may give him the money he craves, but it won't bring him the votes--which is what actually counts come November.
Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Liberal Insanity Here and Abroad
Insanity has sometimes been defined as 'continuing to do the same thing, yet expect a different outcome'. If we use this definition then Europe is insane and so are all Liberals who think that Socialism is the answer to creating prosperity and security for all.
If one looks at history, you'll find that when Socialism/Communism has been tried, it has failed and those countries who haven't failed yet are mired in misery. Socialism does not work, yet we just witnessed Europeans throw a tantrum at facing the reality that their system will soon collapse and vote Socialist parties in to allow them to continue on their road to disaster. I feel sorry for the people because I understand why they did it, but I also shake my head at their ignorance and the grief they are bringing upon themselves.
Let's hope Americans will not fall for the 'pie in the sky' fantasy that Socialism is and has always been. Sooner or later reality sets in and the bottom falls out. I hope Europe's 'bottom' will fall out before America follows their same foolish path.
If one looks at history, you'll find that when Socialism/Communism has been tried, it has failed and those countries who haven't failed yet are mired in misery. Socialism does not work, yet we just witnessed Europeans throw a tantrum at facing the reality that their system will soon collapse and vote Socialist parties in to allow them to continue on their road to disaster. I feel sorry for the people because I understand why they did it, but I also shake my head at their ignorance and the grief they are bringing upon themselves.
Let's hope Americans will not fall for the 'pie in the sky' fantasy that Socialism is and has always been. Sooner or later reality sets in and the bottom falls out. I hope Europe's 'bottom' will fall out before America follows their same foolish path.
Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Santorum at a crossroads;
Now that Mitt Romney has won Wisconsin, Maryland and D.C., the momentum will most likely propel him to win the GOP nomination. Who will be his running mate? I can tell you who it won't be; Rick Santorum. Up until a couple of weeks ago, he was still under consideration but not now. He took himself out of the running when he made that unfortunate remark about Romney being the 'worst republican' in America anyone could vote for. I've heard his explanations and I understand and accept them but the damage is insurmountable. Romney could never put him on the ticket because that ONE soundbite would be replayed over and over and thrown up in his face at every turn. There is absolutely no way he can walk that one back and be able to stand by Romney's side as his running mate.
My own feeling is that Santorum is at a crossroads. He's a young man and if he bows out now, gracefully(as Romney did four years ago when he ran against McCain), and puts the Republican party and the desire to defeat Obama in November first, he stands a good chance of being the Party's pick in four or eight years. But...if he continues this campaign by double teaming Romney with Gingrich's help (which will end badly to be sure) both will lose their power within the party as well as any reputation they enjoy at this time.
And if Santorum chooses to stay in the race till the Pennsylvania primary, He MUST win it, because if he loses, I predict he loses his political career as well. Santorum has managed to make voters forget that he had that huge, devastating and historic loss in Pennsylvania and if he loses again, this time, it will damage him beyond repair.
It's up to him; does he let his ego and pride be his downfall or does he humble himself and accept the 'will of the people'? We'll see.
My own feeling is that Santorum is at a crossroads. He's a young man and if he bows out now, gracefully(as Romney did four years ago when he ran against McCain), and puts the Republican party and the desire to defeat Obama in November first, he stands a good chance of being the Party's pick in four or eight years. But...if he continues this campaign by double teaming Romney with Gingrich's help (which will end badly to be sure) both will lose their power within the party as well as any reputation they enjoy at this time.
And if Santorum chooses to stay in the race till the Pennsylvania primary, He MUST win it, because if he loses, I predict he loses his political career as well. Santorum has managed to make voters forget that he had that huge, devastating and historic loss in Pennsylvania and if he loses again, this time, it will damage him beyond repair.
It's up to him; does he let his ego and pride be his downfall or does he humble himself and accept the 'will of the people'? We'll see.
Thursday, March 29, 2012
Rising Gas prices fueled by inflation
Gas prices are skyrocketing and I've heard too many say that Pres. Obama is not responsible and has no control over the rising prices. I've even heard the President claim this himself. But he is wrong. He is responsible because the gas prices are rising partly because of inflation--inflation which he is directly responsible for because his governing is what caused it!
The President and his administration were warned repeatedly that if we continued to spend and print money (as they did with the stimulus packages) it would bring on inflation. That's exactly what is happening now. We are seeing the price of Gas go up much more than it should have because the dollar is weak. We are also seeing prices of energy and food go up.
The President thinks the solution is for us to drive electric cars, but once again he is out of touch. Most of us drive gasoline cars and old ones at that--we don't have 40,000.00 to spend on a car and there are no charging stations to 'gas' these cars at anyway. By forcing the issue rather than helping us ease slowly into alternate forms of energy, he's causing a crisis.
Voters need to realize that if they vote the President back into office, they will get more of the same--at an even fast rate of loss. I sure hope they will think very carefully about that.
The President and his administration were warned repeatedly that if we continued to spend and print money (as they did with the stimulus packages) it would bring on inflation. That's exactly what is happening now. We are seeing the price of Gas go up much more than it should have because the dollar is weak. We are also seeing prices of energy and food go up.
The President thinks the solution is for us to drive electric cars, but once again he is out of touch. Most of us drive gasoline cars and old ones at that--we don't have 40,000.00 to spend on a car and there are no charging stations to 'gas' these cars at anyway. By forcing the issue rather than helping us ease slowly into alternate forms of energy, he's causing a crisis.
Voters need to realize that if they vote the President back into office, they will get more of the same--at an even fast rate of loss. I sure hope they will think very carefully about that.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)